This Is What Actually Works in 2026!
Hasan Aboul Hasan
Master advanced AI prompting techniques like recursive brainstorming to unlock innovative ideas.
Executive Summary
In the video "This Is What Actually Works in 2026!", the presenter outlines five advanced tactics for effective prompt engineering that can significantly enhance AI output. These tactics include recursive brainstorming, web JSON techniques, feedback loops, model judging, and semantic routing, each demonstrated with practical examples. The video emphasizes the importance of structured prompts and provides a free playground tool for users to experiment with these techniques, aiming to improve AI interactions and outcomes.
Key Takeaways
- Utilize the recursive brainstorming technique by prompting AI to generate ideas and then diving deeper into each idea for more specific sub-ideas.
- Implement the web JSON technique to structure AI responses in JSON format, enabling easier integration into applications like dashboards or carousel generators.
- Create a feedback loop by prompting AI to critique its own responses, allowing for iterative improvements until you achieve the desired quality of output.
- Use the LM judge tactic to compare responses from multiple AI models, selecting the best answer or synthesizing elements from each for a superior result.
- Incorporate documentation injection by providing relevant code snippets or context when prompting AI to ensure it aligns with your specific requirements.
- Engage in learning by building; ask AI to guide you through creating a project step-by-step instead of just explaining concepts theoretically.
Key Insights
- The recursive brainstorming technique allows users to delve deeper into ideas, revealing layers of creativity that traditional prompting methods often overlook, thus enhancing the ideation process significantly.
- Utilizing the web JSON technique transforms how data is structured and retrieved, enabling seamless integration of AI-generated content into applications, which can streamline workflows and enhance productivity.
- The feedback loop method emphasizes iterative improvement, showcasing how AI can refine its outputs through self-critique, leading to more precise and tailored responses that better meet user needs.
- Implementing semantic routing in AI prompts allows for more efficient data retrieval, ensuring that responses are contextually relevant and reducing the risk of irrelevant information cluttering outputs.
- The concept of documentation injection highlights the importance of context in AI interactions, demonstrating that providing specific guidelines can dramatically enhance the quality and relevance of AI-generated code and content.
Summary Points
- The video presents five advanced prompt engineering tactics for improved AI results in 2026.
- Recursive brainstorming allows deeper idea generation by building on initial prompts.
- The web JSON technique structures AI responses for easier data manipulation and visualization.
- Feedback loops enhance AI responses through iterative critique and improvement.
- Semantic routing retrieves specific information from structured content based on user queries.
Detailed Summary
- The video begins with a recap of the creator's successful prompt engineering course from 2023, highlighting its popularity with over 1 million views and 40,000 likes, setting the stage for new advanced tactics in 2026.
- A brief overview of prompt engineering is provided, emphasizing the importance of crafting effective prompts using four pillars: role, task, context, and rules, which many users often overlook, leading to suboptimal results.
- The first advanced tactic introduced is 'recursive brainstorming,' where users can iteratively generate deeper layers of ideas by prompting AI to expand on initial concepts, showcasing its potential for uncovering innovative business ideas.
- The 'web JSON technique' is explained as a method for prompting AI to search the web and return structured data in JSON format, which can be utilized for various applications like carousel generation and live data dashboards.
- The 'feedback loop' tactic encourages users to refine AI-generated outputs through iterative feedback, allowing for continuous improvement of responses, which can be particularly useful for educational content aimed at younger audiences.
- The 'LM judge' tactic involves generating multiple responses from different AI models and using one model to evaluate and select the best answer, enhancing the quality of results through comparative analysis.
- The final tactic, 'LM retrieval,' utilizes semantic routing to navigate structured content, enabling AI to provide precise answers based on user queries while minimizing token usage, demonstrating its efficiency in information retrieval.
- The video concludes with additional tips for effective prompting, such as starting with criticism, mixing different topics for unique ideas, and learning by building projects, encouraging viewers to explore the creator's free playground for practical application.
What are the four pillars of a good AI prompt as mentioned in the video?
What is the first advanced tactic introduced in the video?
How does the Web JSON Technique enhance AI prompting?
What is the purpose of the Feedback Loop tactic?
In the LM Judge tactic, what are the three modes available for evaluation?
What does the LM Retrieval tactic utilize to navigate through structured content?
What is a recommended approach when brainstorming ideas with AI?
What is the suggested method for learning with AI according to the video?
What is the primary function of the free playground mentioned in the video?
What are the four pillars of a good AI prompt?
The four pillars are: Role (who the AI should be), Task (what you want the AI to do), Context (background information needed), and Rules (guidelines and examples to follow). Skipping any of these can lead to suboptimal results.
What is the recursive brainstorming technique?
Recursive brainstorming involves generating ideas and then asking the AI to create sub-ideas from those initial ideas. This technique allows for deeper exploration of topics and can uncover insights that may not be immediately apparent.
How can the web JSON technique be applied?
The web JSON technique prompts AI to search the web and return results in a structured JSON format. This can be useful for generating carousels, dashboards, or comparison tables, enhancing the usability of AI-generated data.
What is the purpose of the feedback loop in AI prompting?
The feedback loop involves prompting the AI, receiving an answer, and then asking the AI to critique and improve its own response. This iterative process can refine the output, leading to clearer and more accurate results.
Describe the LM judge technique.
The LM judge technique generates multiple responses from different AI models and uses one model to evaluate them. It can select the best answer, synthesize responses, or compare them to highlight strengths and weaknesses.
What is semantic routing in AI prompting?
Semantic routing allows AI to navigate through structured content, selecting the best parent and child nodes based on user queries. This method enhances accuracy and efficiency in retrieving relevant information without overwhelming the model with unnecessary data.
What is the creative mix formula in AI brainstorming?
The creative mix formula involves combining two unrelated topics to generate unique ideas. For instance, merging Netflix's business model with language learning challenges can lead to innovative product ideas that leverage both concepts.
How can context improve AI responses?
Providing context, such as relevant documentation or specific examples, helps the AI understand the framework within which it should operate. This leads to more tailored and accurate outputs that align with the user's needs.
What is the significance of learning by building in AI education?
Learning by building encourages users to engage with AI by creating projects rather than just passively receiving information. This hands-on approach fosters deeper understanding and retention of concepts, making learning more effective.
What are some prompting tips for effective AI interaction?
1. Start with criticism to challenge ideas. 2. Use the creative mix formula to generate unique concepts. 3. Inject context for clarity. 4. Learn by building projects for practical understanding.
What is the purpose of the free playground mentioned in the video?
The free playground allows users to test and visualize various AI prompting techniques. It provides tools for brainstorming, feedback loops, and semantic routing, making it easier to experiment with and understand advanced prompting strategies.
How does the LM retrieval technique work?
The LM retrieval technique uses structured content to allow AI to find and return relevant information based on user queries. It avoids using embeddings or vector databases, relying instead on pure text navigation.
What are the benefits of using multiple AI models for generating responses?
Using multiple AI models can provide diverse perspectives and outputs. This approach allows for better evaluation of responses, as one model can judge the strengths and weaknesses of others, leading to improved overall results.
What is the main takeaway from the video regarding AI prompting?
The video emphasizes that effective AI prompting requires understanding and applying advanced techniques like recursive brainstorming, feedback loops, and semantic routing to achieve better results and enhance creativity in AI interactions.
Study Notes
The video begins with a brief overview of the presenter’s previous work on prompt engineering, highlighting the success of their 2023 course which garnered over 1 million views. The presenter emphasizes that the landscape of AI prompting has evolved significantly by 2026, necessitating a fresh look at advanced tactics that can enhance results. They mention that they have observed five advanced tactics that are not commonly discussed yet can drastically improve outcomes when prompting AI. This sets the stage for the detailed exploration of these tactics in the video.
Before diving into advanced tactics, the presenter provides a one-minute refresher on the fundamentals of prompt engineering. They explain that effective prompting hinges on four key pillars: role, task, context, and rules. Each pillar plays a crucial role in shaping the AI's output. The presenter illustrates this with a simple example, emphasizing that many users overlook one or two pillars, which can lead to suboptimal results. This foundational knowledge is essential for understanding the advanced techniques that follow.
The first advanced tactic introduced is recursive brainstorming, which involves prompting the AI to generate ideas in layers. The presenter demonstrates this by asking for the top five business ideas for the AI era and then recursively prompting the AI to generate sub-ideas for each of those initial ideas. This method allows users to delve deeper into topics and uncover insights that may not surface through traditional brainstorming methods. The presenter notes that while manual recursive brainstorming can be tedious, they provide a free playground tool to automate this process, making it more efficient and user-friendly.
The second tactic discussed is the web JSON technique, which involves prompting the AI to search the web and return results in a structured JSON format. The presenter provides a practical example of how this technique can be utilized to generate carousel slides from JSON data. They explain the versatility of this method, which can be applied to various use cases, such as creating dashboards or comparison tables. The presenter emphasizes that mastering this technique can be a game changer for developers working with AI, as it opens up numerous possibilities for data presentation and manipulation.
The third tactic is the feedback loop, where users prompt the AI to generate an initial response and then critique and improve that response through iterative feedback. The presenter illustrates this with an example of explaining quantum computing to a child, showing how the AI can refine its output based on user feedback. This method encourages continuous improvement and allows for more precise and tailored responses. The presenter highlights the importance of this iterative process in achieving high-quality outputs from AI models.
The fourth tactic involves using a language model as a judge to evaluate multiple responses generated by different models. The presenter explains that this method allows users to select the best answer, synthesize responses, or compare strengths and weaknesses of various outputs. This approach is particularly useful in complex tasks requiring nuanced reasoning. The presenter showcases how to implement this tactic using their playground tool, emphasizing its effectiveness in refining AI-generated content and ensuring high-quality results.
The final tactic discussed is LM retrieval, which utilizes semantic routing to navigate structured content and retrieve accurate information based on user queries. The presenter explains how this technique can enhance the efficiency of AI interactions by allowing the model to select the most relevant information without overwhelming it with unnecessary data. They provide an example of how this technique is applied in their Onto Digest tool, which summarizes video content and generates study materials. This method is crucial for optimizing AI performance and ensuring relevant outputs.
Towards the end of the video, the presenter shares four additional prompting tips aimed at enhancing user interactions with AI. These include starting with criticism to challenge ideas, using creative mixes of different topics to generate unique ideas, injecting context into prompts for better AI responses, and learning by building projects rather than just theoretical explanations. These tips are designed to help users maximize the potential of AI and foster more productive engagements with the technology, ultimately leading to better outcomes in various applications.
The video concludes with the presenter encouraging viewers to explore the free playground tool they developed for testing and visualizing the discussed techniques. They emphasize the importance of experimenting with these advanced tactics to fully leverage AI capabilities. The presenter also invites viewers to subscribe for future updates and to support their work on GitHub. This closing section reinforces the practical application of the content covered and encourages ongoing learning and engagement with AI technologies.
Key Terms & Definitions
Transcript
Back in 2023, I published one of the first prompt engineering courses here on YouTube. More than 1 million views and 40,000 likes. But it's 2026 now and a lot has changed. While preparing this video, I watched the latest prompting videos from top creators on YouTube. They are great, but I noticed there are five advanced tactics no one talked about and these can completely change your results. In the next few minutes, I break down each with a practical example and I'll give you my free playground so you can understand easily, test, and visualize. If you are ready, let's get started. Now, before we dive into our first advanced tactic, let's do a quick one minute refresher on prompt engineering in general. Regardless of the debates around the term itself, the idea is super simple. The better you prompt AI, the better results you get. And every good prompt has four pillars: roll, task, context, and rules. Here's a quick example. the role, who should the AI be, the task, what you want the AI to do, the context, the background info it needs, the rules, the guidelines, and the examples they I should follow when generating the output. Simple, but most people skip one or two, and this is why they don't get exactly what they want. That's enough. Let's now get into our advanced tactics. Number one is what we call recursive brain storm. The idea is simple. The implementation is a bit tricky but I'll make it simple too. So here I am include you can use charge, Gemini, Deepseek, whatever you prefer. I will start with this simple example, a very basic prompt so you can grasp the idea easily. What are the top five business ideas that will last in the AI era in the next 10 years? Return as a bullet list. So here I'm just prompting Clo to give me a bullet list of ideas. Let's test this. It says, "Hey Hassan and Ali because my child sometimes uses clothes." So here we have these five ideas. Now here where it gets interesting. We grab this first idea and we ask code now again brainstorm five child ideas under AI education upskilling. So we had the first layer with five ideas. We grab the first one and then we brainstorm five child ideas under this current topic. So now we have five sub ideas under the first one. We can repeat the same concept with all these five burnt ideas. But now I want to go more deep and ask it to brainstorm under this child one. Now brainstorm ideas under you see what's happening here. We are going recursively brainstorming going deep deep to discover ideas that you never thought about. And this can work on any topic on anything you want to brainstorm ideas around. Now the problem is if you want to do this manually suppose we have 10% ideas for each one you want to brainstorm and then go deep and deep and let's say you want to go 10 levels deep. Honestly it will be boring and will take a lot of time. So this is why we need a way to automate this prompting technique. So what I did is I implemented it inside simple LM and a few lines of code you can automate this process. But maybe you are not into coding. So what I did is I built this free playground. So you can test and prompt learn and visualize these techniques easily. So here in tools I will click on brainstorm and simply here select the provider and let's go with 4.0. It's faster now. And simply enter the prompt you want to brainstorm ideas around. Let's go with the same prompt. What are the top business ideas? Here in the parameters, you can select the max depth. How many layers you can you want to go down? Let's go now with two. And ideas per level. Let's go with three just to understand the concept now. And by the way, it will give you also the code example. So you can copy and test directly. Let's run now start brainstorm. And you will see now in the canvas here in this section the tree the brainstorm tree will start to appear. So this is the first level we have three ideas. Now it's going into the next layer which is level one and brainstorm three ideas for each parent topic. This is the first depth and in few seconds you'll get the second ideas and then the last one and the brainstorm completed. You can zoom in, you can drag these nodes as you like and more importantly you can click on any of these nodes and you can read the details here the data inscription and the score of the ideas. So each of these ideas will have detailed section and a score. Let's do this with three as max depth. Run again. And perfect. In 127 seconds, we get 21 ideas with with average score of 8.2. And here in the idea tree, you can see the full ideas. And by the way, you can click export results and export into JSON and you will see in detail how the brainstorm worked. Maybe you want to use this maybe in your application, another prompt and so on. Okay, let's now move on to tactic number two, the web JSON technique. The idea is simple. It's all about prompting AI to search the web and then return in a structured JSON format. Let me show you a direct example. So this is a prompt and the key terms here is search the web and return JSON in this format. So you see now after the research we get this JSON response. Now you may be wondering okay but what's the use case here? How is this helpful? Let me show you an example I build and I'm sure will shock you. If you copy this JSON here and I will take it into my carousel generator tool and if I run now the carousel generator this simple command here in a few seconds I will get this output. It converted each of the JSON records into a carousel slide. You see and this is how I can generate carousels easily. So it is the engine the webjson technique is the engine of micousal generator and we have many other use cases like building dashboards with live data creating comparison tables for different products and much more we have infinite possibility if you understand this technique it will be a game changer especially if you are building products with AI and by the way I'll be sharing the car generator fully open source for free in my next videos. So don't forget to subscribe and notifications so you don't miss any new update. And of course you can test this web JSON technique in the playground I built for you. We see here web search plus JSON. So I will paste the prompt here. Select the provider the model and now we can construct how you want the output to be or you can simply paste the code in Python. So I'll paste the structure I want. So, we have a list of stories. Generate. Wait a couple of seconds. Perfect. And now we have this structured out. You see the JSON here. Perfect. Let's now move on to tactic number three, the feedback loop. This one is interesting. The idea again is really super simple. So you prompt the language model but instead of accepting the first answer you go through a loop of feedback and improvement until we get better result. Let's see a practical example. Let's open a new chat and I will go with this simple basic prompt. Generate a sentence to explain quantum computing the best way for an 8-year-old kid. Imagine a magic code that can be both head and behaves at the same time while it's spinning. And quantum computers use tiny things like that magic coin to solve really hard puzzles much faster than regular computers can. Perfect. So this is the first answer. Now with the feedback loop, we get this answer and we tell the model like clo in our case or maybe other model to analyze and improve. So we have this feedback improvement loop. I will simulate this now. I will open a new chat. I will paste this result here and I will tell it here is a sentence explaining quantum computing to an 8-year-old. Let's add double quotes and then I will add a simple prompt like this one. Critique this explanation. Is it too complex? Are there simpler words we could use then write an improved version. This is the first iteration trying to improve the first answer with the same model. As I mentioned, we can grab this to JPT. So we can ask other model to do this and so on. Maybe Gemini. So let's run this. It gives me the critique what could be simpler and then it gives me the improved version and so on. You can go with three, four, five, 100 iterations maybe. But it will maybe overoptimize then. Now let's open our playground. And here we have the LM feedback. So I will paste the prompt and then you can even add initial answer to be evaluated based on but now we will leave it for the AI. We can select the architecture single dual or multi. So when you switch between those you see here we can select different providers in dual mode. You can select two providers one for generation one for critique. Let's go with single. So the same provider will critique itself and go into this feedback loop. I will go here with open AAI GPT40 and you can set the max iterations the quality threshold and so on and the evaluation criteria like clarity creativity and so on and then start improvement let's wait a little bit and you can see here the iterations with the answer with the critique for each iteration and then it outputs the final answer here you can see the scores and it stopped in three because the score didn't change. This is what I mentioned about over optimization. So the playground will handle this automatically. If the score stays the same, it will output and stop the feedback loop. Let's now move to tactic number four, the LM judge. And here we are moving from feedback to having a judge. So the idea instead of having the language model, the AI improving itself with iterations, with feedback and improvement, we generate multiple responses from different models, then grab one as a judge to evaluate them all. And here we have three judge modes. Number one, select best. So the judge will select the best answer from all the models. Number two, synthesize which combines all the elements from different models into one improved answer and the compare. It will return detail analysis breaking down the weakness and the strength of each provider. So in short, you open a code, you paste the prompt and get a result. You go to charge PT, you paste and get a result. Then you copy those results into the judge. for example here Gemini and ask it to generate the best or synthesize or compare. I will skip now the manual implementation to save some time. Let's go to the playground and see this in action. So we have the judge. You see the judge mode select best synthesize or compare. And you can add here the providers you want to compare like open AI GPT4 and open AAI for example GPT4 mini. And let's ask the same question on quantum computing in one sentence. And the judge LM will be for example OpenAI GPD 5 and then start evaluation. As I mentioned before, you can always grab this code snippet and try it in code if you want. Let's wait a little bit and in a few seconds you'll get the results from both models with the score with the winner and you can click to see the full breakdown the evaluation strengths weakness and the scores and you can see here the final answer from the judge. This is really super powerful when you can't afford just using the first answer from AI. I use this especially in some NLP and language tasks and things that require intensive reasoning from the language models and when building data sets. For example, in my case, I need to get results from different models then judge each response and see the weaknesses and this will help you spot a lot of details and points that you can improve your results based on. Let's now move on to tactic number five. LM retrieval. This one is a bit tricky. I'll explain directly with examples. So here I am in simple LM website. If you go in documentation, you see we have the full documentation for this library. So we have the parent sections like getting started, core features, providers. These are the parent sections. In each we have child sections, introduction, quick start. Here we have reliable LM structured output and so on. So you can see we have like a tree of structured content and in each of these sections that you will open we have a lot of content that can be split into multiple chunks too. So visualize with me we have like a tree of content that resembles this documentation. Now what I want is to use prompts and AI to navigate through this tree and grab and retrieve accurate data. And here we use something called semantic routing. So we will ask the AI based on the user query select the best parent nodes then select the best child nodes from the parents you selected and so on navigating through this structure to get the best answer based on the user query. Now a practical example I developed based on this technique is onto digest. If you open it now and grab any video, you will see we have summaries, quiz, flashcards, study notes, a lot of content around this video. The topic, the idea here is we have this feature to chat with this video. So instead of passing the full video transcript and chatting with it and this may increase hallucinations, I transform the video text or content into a structured format where the language model can navigate. If I ask it for example in three words summarize the video. What will happen now is using semantic routing it will decide to pick the full video or a specific chunk. In our case we will need the full transcript to summarize the video. But if we ask it summarize the 12 month plan the speaker outlined in five words. In this case, instead of grabbing the full transcript AI using semantic routing will go and grab the section in the video that is talking about the 12 month plan and get back the answer. This is very important to save on tokens to get accurate results especially in chat boats. I hope you get the idea with semantic routing. It has a lot of real use cases that transforms the way you prompt AI and you build applications with AI. Going back to our playground here, we have the LM retrieval and I created this demo. So you can build the index. Let's go with 40. build an index to test with like AI news articles or you can paste your own text here because with LM retrieval we don't use embeddings like in rag if you are familiar with rag we have vectors and embeddings and vector databases no we have just pure text and the language model will navigate through this structured index based on semantic meanings we got this simple chunks of data now we go here and query let's say what about AI safety for example search and a few seconds now the language model without using any databases or vectors and so on will get the best answer from these chunks and you can see this the chunk here so we have the cluster and AI with semantic routing will pick the best answers we are not done yet I still have four prompting tips I want to share with you quickly in like 1 minute number One, start with a criticism. Especially if you are brainstorming ideas because AI by default will make you feel like you're Einstein. It was a great idea and you go with it. We don't want this. We want AI to actually challenge your ideas and thinking and give you honest feedback. So always start with something like before you respond critically analyze my idea. Point out weaknesses, gaps, and potential failures first. Be brutally honest. I need real feedback, not encouragement. And this will transform totally the way AI will respond. The second tip, the creative mix formula. If you want truly unique ideas, you can mix completely two different topics together and ask AI to find intersection. This way, you force AI to make connections no one else is making. For example, combine the business model of Netflix with the problem of learning a new language. Give me five unique product ideas that merge these two worlds in unexpected ways. So, we mix different concepts together and brainstorm really interesting ideas. Try this. I'm sure you will love it and you read things you never thought about. Number three, context is everything or context is the king. Especially today when coding with AI, the idea is simple. For example, let's say you want to build the LM judge we talked about with simple LM. Instead of telling AI build an LLM judge application for me or whatever, what we do is we inject the documentation or the code snippets in the context. So AI can follow the same pattern. For example, here you can go here to my application, go to judge and go to the code example, copy the code and you can say here docs to use and paste the code. So we inject the way we want the AI to write the code so it knows exactly how this works and what you want exactly. This is what I call documentation injection when building and coding with AI. Tip number four is learn by building. Instead of asking AI to explain something, ask it to teach you by building a project. For example, include here we have also the learning mode. You can select it and you can prompt it like this. I want to learn how rest APIs work. You can change this topic whatever you want. Don't just explain the theory. Teach me by building a simple API project together. So you will go step by step learning by building and this is really a game changer and this by the way how I developed and built my solo builder course. So you can go from zero to building your dream project by building while learning. If you interested you can check the course in the description below. Now what about the playground? How to get it and use it? Simply the description below you'll find a link to download this application. It's totally for free. You can run it even without installations as a portable application. And when you open it, you'll go to settings and enter the API keys of providers you want to use. You can even use local models open source with for example here in this basic chat playground. You can select here and select the model you have it in after you install it and then you can chat with local models or use it in any tool you want. For example, if you go here to brainstorm, you can select here and select the model and use local models for testing. We have also this tool I didn't mention where you can compare models real time and chat with two models at the same time. For example, here you can select OpenAI GPT4 and OpenAI GPT4 or mini and ask it the same question. high and then you get answers from both models. You can compare them real time in the same chat window. If you learned something new today, if you enjoyed this video, don't forget to support my simple library with simple star on GitHub. And more importantly, smash the like button so the video can reach more people and benefit more people. Thank you for following and see you next week.
Title Analysis
The title uses a future-oriented phrase 'What Actually Works in 2026!' which creates curiosity about advancements in prompt engineering. However, it lacks sensational language, ALL CAPS, or excessive punctuation. The title is straightforward and hints at valuable content without resorting to exaggeration.
The title closely aligns with the content, which discusses advanced tactics in prompt engineering relevant to 2026. While it may not cover every detail, it accurately reflects the focus on practical examples and techniques that enhance AI prompting, making it a strong representation of the video's intent.
Content Efficiency
The video presents a high level of unique and valuable information, particularly in the breakdown of advanced prompting techniques. While there are some repetitive phrases and slight filler content, the majority of the content is focused on delivering actionable insights. The introduction and transitions between tactics could be streamlined to enhance the overall density.
The pacing of the video is generally good, with a clear structure that guides the viewer through complex ideas. However, some sections could be more concise, particularly the explanations of the playground tools, which tend to linger on details that may not be essential for all viewers. Overall, the video is moderately efficient but could benefit from tighter editing.
Improvement Suggestions
To enhance information density, consider reducing the length of introductory remarks and transitions between tactics. Focus on delivering examples more succinctly and avoid reiterating points that have already been made. Additionally, eliminating any tangential discussions would help maintain viewer engagement and improve time efficiency.
Content Level & Clarity
The content is rated at a level score of 7, indicating an advanced difficulty. This score is justified as the material discusses advanced tactics in prompt engineering, which requires a significant understanding of AI concepts and prior experience with prompt crafting. The audience is expected to have foundational knowledge of AI and its applications, making it less suitable for complete beginners.
The teaching clarity score is 8, reflecting a generally clear and structured presentation. The speaker effectively breaks down complex concepts into manageable parts, using practical examples to illustrate advanced tactics. However, some sections could benefit from more concise explanations to enhance understanding, especially for viewers who may not be as familiar with the topic.
Prerequisites
A foundational understanding of AI concepts, familiarity with prompt engineering, and basic programming skills are recommended to fully grasp the content.
Suggestions to Improve Clarity
To improve clarity and structure, the content could include more visual aids or diagrams to illustrate complex ideas. Additionally, summarizing key points at the end of each tactic would reinforce learning. Reducing jargon or providing definitions for technical terms would also help make the material more accessible to a broader audience.
Educational Value
The content provides a comprehensive overview of advanced prompt engineering techniques relevant to AI applications, making it highly educational. It covers five advanced tactics, each with clear examples and practical applications, enhancing the viewer's understanding of how to effectively interact with AI models. The teaching methodology is effective, utilizing a step-by-step approach that breaks down complex concepts into manageable parts. The inclusion of a free playground for testing and visualizing these techniques supports hands-on learning, which is crucial for knowledge retention. The content is rich in factual information, offering insights into the structure of prompts and the importance of context, which are vital for anyone looking to leverage AI in their work. Overall, it facilitates learning by encouraging viewers to apply the techniques in real-world scenarios, thus enhancing their practical skills.
Target Audience
Content Type Analysis
Content Type
Format Improvement Suggestions
- Add visual aids to enhance understanding
- Include timestamps for key sections
- Provide downloadable resources or links
- Incorporate interactive elements for viewer engagement
- Summarize key points at the end of the video
Language & Readability
Original Language
EnglishModerate readability. May contain some technical terms or complex sentences.
Content Longevity
Timeless Factors
- Fundamental principles of prompt engineering
- Basic AI interaction techniques
- Continuous relevance of AI in various fields
- Growing interest in AI applications and tools
- The need for effective communication with AI models
Occasional updates recommended to maintain relevance.
Update Suggestions
- Incorporate updates on the latest AI models and tools available
- Add examples of new applications or use cases for prompt engineering
- Reference recent advancements in AI technology and methodologies
- Include feedback from users on the effectiveness of the tactics discussed
- Update statistics related to AI usage and trends in the industry