Why is knowledge getting so expensive? | Jeffrey Edmunds | TEDxPSU - Tutorial video by TEDx Talks 16:00

Why is knowledge getting so expensive? | Jeffrey Edmunds | TEDxPSU

TEDx Talks

One Key Takeaway

Watch on YouTube

Knowledge should be treated as a public good, not a private commodity controlled by publishers.

Executive Summary

📖 < 1 min 16 min

In his TEDx talk, Jeffrey Edmunds discusses the rising costs of knowledge due to the shift from physical books to eBooks, emphasizing that consumers do not actually purchase eBooks but rather acquire licenses for access. This licensing model, controlled by a few major publishers, leads to inflated prices and limits libraries' ability to provide access to knowledge. Edmunds advocates for treating knowledge as a public good, suggesting that the academic community should move towards open access resources to ensure equitable access to information that has been collectively funded.

Key Takeaways

  • Advocate for open access resources in your institution to reduce costs associated with traditional publishing.
  • Explore and utilize open educational resources (OER) for textbooks to save money and enhance learning flexibility.
  • Engage in discussions about library licensing practices to raise awareness of the issues surrounding ebook access.
  • Support initiatives that promote public funding for libraries and educational resources to ensure equitable access to knowledge.
  • Participate in or organize workshops on copyright laws to better understand the implications of digital content ownership.

Key Insights

  • The distinction between owning a physical book and merely licensing an ebook reveals a systemic issue in knowledge access, impacting libraries and consumers alike.
  • Publishers' control over ebook licensing creates an oligopoly, driving costs up and limiting libraries' ability to provide equitable access to knowledge.
  • The current model of scholarly publishing is economically unsustainable, as universities fund knowledge creation yet pay exorbitantly to access it, highlighting a broken system.
  • Transitioning knowledge from a private commodity to a public good could democratize access, fostering an informed citizenry and challenging the existing publishing paradigm.
  • Open Access initiatives and Open Educational Resources present viable alternatives, enabling free access to knowledge and reducing the financial burden on students and institutions.

Summary Points

  • The transition from physical books to ebooks has led to libraries losing ownership of their collections.
  • Ebooks are licensed, not owned, resulting in higher costs and restrictions for libraries.
  • Publishers control the ebook market, leading to inflated prices and bundling practices that disadvantage libraries.
  • Knowledge creation is funded by public resources, yet publishers profit by charging libraries for access.
  • Open Access and Open Educational Resources offer sustainable alternatives to traditional publishing models.

Detailed Summary

  • Jeffrey Edmunds introduces a scenario illustrating the impact of digital licensing on libraries, highlighting the bizarre reality where libraries lose access to thousands of eBooks, akin to theft.
  • He explains the fundamental difference between purchasing physical books and eBooks, emphasizing that eBooks are not owned but licensed, which has significant implications for libraries' collections and budgets.
  • Edmunds discusses the oligopoly of five major publishers controlling the eBook market, leading to artificially high prices, non-disclosure agreements preventing price comparisons, and bundling practices that force libraries to acquire unwanted titles.
  • He elaborates on the paradox of knowledge creation, where universities fund research and produce scholarly work, only to have publishers charge libraries exorbitantly for access to that knowledge.
  • The speaker reveals that Penn State libraries spent over $13 million on eBooks last year, underscoring the unsustainable economic model of higher education and the urgent need for reform.
  • Edmunds proposes viewing knowledge as a public good rather than a private commodity, advocating for open access initiatives that allow free and equitable access to educational resources.
  • He highlights successful examples of open access, such as the transition from a costly journal to a free alternative, demonstrating the potential for libraries to provide accessible resources without publisher control.
  • Finally, he emphasizes the role of libraries in supporting democracy by ensuring informed citizenry through free access to knowledge, arguing that collectively funded knowledge should be available to all.
0 of 0

What is the primary issue discussed in the video regarding ebooks?

0 of 0

According to the video, what is one reason publishers have high prices for ebooks?

0 of 0

What is the economic model that the speaker suggests for knowledge?

0 of 0

How much did Penn State libraries spend on ebooks and electronic resources last year?

0 of 0

What is Open Access literature?

0 of 0

What action did the editors of the journal Lingua take in response to high pricing models?

0 of 0

What percentage of Penn State students reported not buying a textbook due to high costs?

0 of 0

What is the primary funding source for universities mentioned in the video?

0 of 0

What is the significance of the 'van' metaphor used in the video?

1 of 14
QUESTION

What happens when libraries transition from physical books to ebooks?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

Libraries lose ownership of their collections, as ebooks are licensed rather than owned. This means libraries can be compelled to remove ebooks from their catalogs, similar to theft.

1 of 14
QUESTION

Why can't you truly 'buy' an ebook?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

When you purchase an ebook, you are actually buying a license to access it, not the ebook itself. This distinction limits your rights compared to owning a physical book.

1 of 14
QUESTION

What are the implications of licensing ebooks for libraries?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

Licensing means libraries can lose access to ebooks at any time, leading to instability in their collections and forcing them to remove thousands of titles regularly.

1 of 14
QUESTION

Who controls the ebook marketplace?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

The ebook marketplace is controlled by a small number of publishers, creating an oligopoly that affects pricing and access to knowledge.

1 of 14
QUESTION

How do publishers manipulate ebook pricing?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

Publishers charge libraries more for ebooks than for print books, bundle content, and impose non-disclosure agreements, preventing libraries from knowing fair market prices.

1 of 14
QUESTION

What is the economic impact of high ebook costs on libraries?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

Libraries, like Penn State, spend millions on ebooks, which strains budgets, especially when faced with significant financial deficits, making the current system unsustainable.

1 of 14
QUESTION

What is Open Access in scholarly publishing?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

Open Access refers to scholarly works that are freely available online without licensing restrictions, allowing wider access to knowledge created by researchers.

1 of 14
QUESTION

How do Open Educational Resources (OER) benefit students?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

OER provide free, adaptable educational materials, reducing costs for students who often forgo purchasing expensive textbooks, thus enhancing access to education.

1 of 14
QUESTION

What is the role of libraries in democracy according to Jeff Edmonds?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

Libraries are essential for democracy as they ensure equitable access to information and knowledge, which is vital for an informed citizenry.

1 of 14
QUESTION

What alternative model does Jeff Edmonds suggest for knowledge?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

Edmonds proposes treating knowledge as a public good rather than a private commodity, advocating for open access to information funded by public resources.

1 of 14
QUESTION

What is the significance of the Open Textbook Library?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

The Open Textbook Library offers over 1,500 free textbooks across disciplines, allowing professors to adapt materials to their courses without incurring costs.

1 of 14
QUESTION

How does the current system of academic publishing affect knowledge creation?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

The system is flawed as universities fund the creation of knowledge but then pay publishers to access it, creating a cycle of inefficiency and high costs.

1 of 14
QUESTION

What are the consequences of high textbook prices for students?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

High textbook prices lead to students opting out of purchasing necessary materials, affecting their education and course enrollment decisions.

1 of 14
QUESTION

What did the editors of the journal Lingua do to protest pricing models?

Click or press SPACE to flip
ANSWER

They left the publisher Elsevier to create their own journal, Glossa, which is free and maintains the same quality without the high costs imposed by traditional publishers.

Study Notes

Jeffrey Edmunds begins the talk with a striking analogy about a library losing access to thousands of books, likening it to theft. This scenario, while exaggerated, reflects a real issue faced by libraries today as they transition from physical books to ebooks. The loss of access to these digital resources is a daily occurrence, highlighting the precarious nature of digital ownership in libraries. This sets the stage for a deeper discussion on the implications of ebook licensing versus ownership, particularly in academic settings.

Edmunds explains that when consumers purchase an ebook, they are not actually buying the book itself but rather a license to access it. This distinction is crucial as it contrasts with the ownership of physical books, which can be resold and fully owned by the buyer. The lecture emphasizes that this licensing model limits the rights of libraries and consumers, leading to a system where access can be revoked at any time, which is a significant concern for institutions that rely heavily on digital collections.

The speaker provides insight into the scale of Penn State's library collections, noting that over 6 million of the 10 million items are ebooks. This shift towards digital resources means that libraries are increasingly dependent on licenses rather than ownership, resulting in the potential removal of thousands of ebooks monthly. This situation raises questions about who truly controls access to knowledge and the implications for academic institutions that rely on these resources for teaching and research.

Edmunds discusses the concentration of power within the publishing industry, where five major publishers dominate the market. This oligopoly allows publishers to set artificially high prices for ebooks, which have been rising faster than inflation. Furthermore, libraries are often bound by non-disclosure agreements that prevent them from discussing pricing, creating an environment where fair market value is obscured. This lack of transparency exacerbates the challenges libraries face in budgeting for digital resources.

The lecture highlights the absurdity of bundled licensing agreements imposed by publishers, where libraries must purchase access to thousands of ebooks, many of which they do not need. Edmunds compares this to a grocery store scenario where customers are forced to buy unwanted items. This practice not only strains library budgets but also limits the ability of institutions to curate collections that meet their specific needs, ultimately affecting the quality of education and research.

Edmunds outlines the process of scholarly publishing, emphasizing that the intellectual labor involved in creating knowledge is primarily conducted by scholars at universities. He points out that universities fund this research through tuition, taxpayer dollars, and grants. After creating knowledge, universities hand it over to publishers, who then charge libraries exorbitant fees to access this information. This cycle raises ethical questions about the commodification of knowledge that is publicly funded.

The speaker reveals that Penn State libraries spent over $13 million on ebooks and electronic resources in the previous year. This financial strain is compounded by the broader budget challenges facing higher education institutions. The discussion underscores the unsustainable nature of the current publishing model, which places a heavy financial burden on libraries that are already struggling with budget deficits, making it imperative to seek alternative solutions.

Edmunds proposes a paradigm shift in how knowledge is viewed, suggesting that it should be treated as a public good rather than a private commodity. He advocates for the elimination of publishers who profit from publicly funded research and encourages the development of open access resources. This approach would ensure that knowledge is freely available to all, similar to public goods like clean air and infrastructure, fostering a more equitable access to information.

The talk introduces the concept of Open Access (OA) and Open Educational Resources (OER), highlighting their potential to alleviate the financial burden of textbooks on students. Edmunds shares that many students at Penn State have opted not to purchase textbooks due to high costs, which can negatively impact their education. By expanding OA and OER initiatives, educational institutions can provide free, adaptable resources that enhance learning without the financial strain on students.

In concluding remarks, Edmunds emphasizes the vital role of libraries in supporting democracy by ensuring access to information. He argues that informed citizens are essential for a functioning democracy, and libraries must provide equitable access to knowledge that has been collectively funded. The call to action is clear: knowledge should not be a commodity but a public good, reinforcing the importance of libraries in society and the need for systemic change in the publishing industry.

Key Terms & Definitions

eBook
A digital version of a book that can be read on electronic devices. Unlike physical books, eBooks are typically licensed rather than owned outright, meaning users pay for access rather than ownership.
Copyright Law
A set of laws that protect the rights of creators over their original works, including books and eBooks. It dictates what can be done with a purchased book, including the ability to resell it, which differs for eBooks.
Licensing
A legal agreement that allows users to access and use a product, such as an eBook, without owning it. Licensing terms can restrict how the product can be used or shared.
Oligopoly
A market structure in which a small number of firms dominate the market. In the context of scholarly publishing, it refers to the five major publishers that control the majority of the market.
Open Access
A publishing model that allows free online access to scholarly research and literature, removing paywalls and licensing restrictions, thus promoting wider dissemination of knowledge.
Open Educational Resources (OER)
Teaching, learning, and research materials that are freely available for anyone to use, adapt, and share. OER can include textbooks, courses, and other educational content.
Public Good
A commodity or service that is made available to all members of a society without profit. In the video, knowledge is proposed to be treated as a public good, accessible to everyone.
Scholarly Publishing
The process of publishing academic research and findings, typically involving peer review and dissemination through journals or books. It is often controlled by major publishers.
Taxpayer Dollars
Public funds collected from citizens through taxes, which are used to support public institutions, including universities, and their operations.
Grant Monies
Funds provided by organizations or governments to support research and educational projects. Many grants have a public funding component, contributing to the creation of knowledge.
Digital Object
Any content that exists in a digital format, including eBooks, articles, and multimedia, which can be easily copied and distributed compared to physical objects.

Transcript

English (auto-generated) 1927 words 10 min read

[Music] imagine you work in a library and one day a van pulls up in front of your building several people get out they come into your library and they show you a list and they say according to our records you no longer have access to these 5,432 books they March into your Stacks pull those books off the shelves load them in the van and drive off what just happened it looks like theft right strangers coming unannounced into your library and making off with a significant chunk of your collection my name is Jeff Edmonds and I do work in a library I've been with the Penn State libraries here well over half my life and I can tell you that is bizarre as far as that scenario sounds it plays out in essence every single day not only here at Penn State but at libraries all over the country as the result of the shift in our collections from books to ebooks quick show of hands how many of you have ever purchased a book I hope everyone in the audience now how many of you have ever purchased an ebook would it surprise you to learn that you didn't purchase an ebook that it's impossible to buy an ebook to understand why we have to look at us copyright law specifically the part of the law that codifies what you can and cannot do with the book that you've purchased when you buy a book that book becomes your personal property you own it you can do whatever you want with it you can even resell it and if you do resell it you get all the money the copyright holder be it the author or the publisher has no claim on that sale now imagine if that were true for ebooks imagine if you could buy and resell an ebook the same way you can buy and resell a printbook we all know that it's infinitely easier to create copies of and distribute copies of digital objects like an ebook compared to a print object like a physical book so as the internet became a thing Publishers realized they faced a crisis if consumers could buy and resell ebooks the same way we can buy and resell print books their profit margins would evaporate and the publish in Industry would collapse so what did they do they made a very astute decision they decided to not sell ebooks so when you clicked on buy it what you were paying for was not that ebook you do not own that ebook you were merely buying a license to access that text now if this distinction between buying and owning outright a print book versus paying for a license to access an ebook seems minor to us as individual consumers for libraries like the one here at Penn State where I work that collect millions of ebooks this distinction has profound and unsettling implications let's start with the sense of scale this is the libraries catalog we currently have about 10 million items of those more than 6 million are online they digital their ebooks fewer than 4 million are actual physical books in the stacks so already the majority of our collections are online they're ebooks and because they're ebooks they're not owned in the same way our print collections are they're subject to licensing and because they're merely licensed they're subject to removal every month we're compelled to remove thousands tens of thousands and some months even hundreds of thousands of eBooks from our catalog this is the van pulling up in front of our building and making off with a chunk of our collection which begs the question who's driving the van if libraries don't own and control their book collections who does the simple answer is Publishers and in the realm of scholarly publishing the kind of publishing that concerns Us in an environment like Penn State there are five Publishers that control the marketplace it's an oligopoly and because they control the marketplace they leverage their advantage in several different ways first the cost of ebooks is artificially high on average it costs more to license an ebook than it does to buy a print book outright second the cost of ebooks over the past several decades has risen much faster than the rate of inflation third Publishers compel libraries to sign contracts that include non-disclosure clauses so that we can't discuss prices with our peer institutions Penn State for example can't go to the University of Michigan or ruter or UCLA and ask how much did you pay for this package of ebooks we have no way of determining what a fair market Price is fourth Publishers bundle their content together so that we're compelled to license thousands and even tens of thousands of ebooks that we neither want nor need imagine you're in the grocery store and you go into the cereal aisle and you pull your favorite cereal off the shelf and put it in your cart and a clerk at the end of the aisle says what are you doing you say well I'm buying this cereal and they say no no no you can't do that store policy is that you have to buy one of each it's absurd right and yet that's what publishers are doing to libraries forcing us to end up with thousands of things we neither want nor need now this very uneven unfair relationship becomes even more absurdist when you consider where the knowledge comes from that populates these ebooks who's creating this knowledge well in a word we are this is how SC Godly publishing Works Scholars do research they write manuscripts those manuscripts are passed to peers who then make comments the comments are passed back to the authors who then revise their manuscripts to improve them and then ultimately an editor or an editorial board decides that this manuscript is worthy of publication say as an ebook or as an article in a scotle journal now note that all of the intellectual labor I just described from start to finish is done at universities the salaries of these people are paid for by universities and how are universities funded well three ways of primary importance first tuition monies so if you're a student paying tuition your money is being used in part to fund this Enterprise of knowledge creation second taxpayer dollars like many institutions Penn State is a public university we depend on money from the Commonwealth every year for our operating budget so here you have taxpayer dollars being used to fund this Enterprise of knowledge creation third Grant monies while some grants can originate from a private individual or private Enterprise the vast majority have a strong publicly funded component so again public funds being used to fund this Enterprise of knowledge creation so we've funded this process we've done the work we've created the knowledge and then what do we do with our manuscript we hand it off to one of these Publishers who then license it back to us at enormous cost the libraries here at Penn State spent over $13 million on ebooks and other electronic resources last year given the Dire Straits in which higher education finds itself we know for example that Penn State just a couple of years ago was facing $142 million budget defit this ecosystem makes no economic sense it's a broken system what could we do to correct it well what if we thought of our knowledge the knowledge that we collectively fund and create not as a private commodity to be handed off to some third party but is a public good what if we thought of it in the same light that we think of good roads sound Bridges a Dependable electrical grid clean air clean water what would that look like in practice in this context well first of all we could say goodbye to these Publishers they need us because we do all the work we don't need them here's an example this is a scolly journal known as lingua it's published by elvir elvir is the largest of those five Publishers their profits last year exceeded $2 billion and annual subscription to lingua costs a library over $2,500 about a decade ago the editors of lingua led by the executive editor a Belgian linguist by the name of Johan rurick decided to walk they said goodbye to elsir because they were disgusted with its pricing models they left and they started their own journal glossa same topic Linguistics same quality same edites except unlike linga gloss is free it's what we call Open Access Open Access literature is literature that's freely available online and free of all or nearly all licensing restrictions if we expand that concept of open access to something else that's of vital importance to an environment like Penn State textbooks we end up with what are called open educational resources or OE we know that the cost of textbooks has risen over a th% in the past 40 years and the prices of textbooks continue to rise at a rate three times the rate of inflation research we've done locally at Penn State has shown us that over half of Penn State students 65% have elected not to buy a textbook because it was too expensive and nearly a third 31% have elected not to take a course because the materials were too expensive this is the open textbook library in the libraries catalog it's a collection of over 1,500 textbooks in all disciplines that are freely available online they're free and they're freely adaptable by that I mean that if a Penn State Professor were to find a textbook in this collection that was perfectly suited to their course except for let's say two chapters they could remove those chapters or rewrite them and upload their version of the textbook to make it freely available to their students as a sustainable model this sure beats the heck out of asking every student in every section of those courses to Shell out 75 or1 or $150 for a textbook that they will probably never use after that course completes if we expand that notion to its broadest possible application we end up with this for several years now the libraries have been working assiduously to identify to locate to make discoverable resources that are not controlled by Publishers that are freely available online free to read these are things that are not behind a pay wall you don't need to authenticate as a Penn State user to look at them they will still be accessible to you after you leave Penn State in fact they're accessible now to anyone with internet access the number currently stands at over 1,200,000 and we expect to see this number rise as we continue our work as I said at the beginning I've been with the libraries for well over half my life over 35 years and I've come to believe that libraries are a fundamental pillar of democracy democracy demands an informed citizenry and informed citizens must have free and Equitable and open access to information and to knowledge especially the knowledge that we've collectively funded and created knowledge is not a private commodity to be handed off to some third party knowledge is a public good and it must be treated as such thank you [Applause]

Title Analysis

Clickbait Score 2/10

The title 'Why is knowledge getting so expensive?' is straightforward and poses a question that invites curiosity without using sensational language or excessive punctuation. It lacks elements typical of clickbait, such as ALL CAPS or exaggeration. The title accurately reflects the serious nature of the topic discussed in the video, focusing on the economics of knowledge access.

Title Accuracy 9/10

The title closely aligns with the content of the video, which discusses the rising costs associated with accessing knowledge, particularly in the context of ebooks and libraries. While it captures the essence of the discussion, it could be slightly more specific about the focus on ebooks and the role of publishers in driving costs, but overall, it accurately represents the video's intent.

Content Efficiency

Information Density 75%

The information density is relatively high, with about 75% of the content providing unique insights into the complexities of ebook licensing and the implications for libraries. While there are some repetitive phrases and a few tangents, the majority of the content is focused on delivering valuable information regarding the economics of knowledge access. The speaker effectively conveys the distinction between owning physical books and licensing ebooks, which is central to the argument.

Time Efficiency 7/10

The time efficiency score is moderate at 7, indicating that while the speaker maintains a good pace, there are moments of unnecessary elaboration that could be streamlined. Some examples include extended metaphors and analogies that, while illustrative, could be shortened to maintain audience engagement. Overall, the content is informative but could benefit from tighter editing to enhance clarity and focus.

Improvement Suggestions

To improve information density and time efficiency, the speaker could reduce the use of analogies that do not directly contribute to the main argument. Streamlining sections that reiterate similar points about the licensing model and its implications for libraries would also help. Additionally, incorporating more succinct examples or case studies could enhance the overall impact without lengthening the duration of the talk.

Content Level & Clarity

Difficulty Level Intermediate (5/10)

The content is rated at a level score of 5, indicating an intermediate difficulty. The speaker discusses complex topics such as copyright law, the economics of ebook publishing, and the implications for libraries, which require some foundational knowledge of these subjects. While the concepts are accessible, a basic understanding of library systems and digital rights would enhance comprehension.

Teaching Clarity 8/10

The teaching clarity score is 8, reflecting a well-structured presentation with a logical flow. The speaker effectively uses analogies, such as the library scenario and grocery store example, to illustrate complex points. However, some segments could benefit from clearer transitions between topics to maintain coherence, especially when shifting from the economic implications to potential solutions.

Prerequisites

A basic understanding of copyright law, digital publishing, and library systems would be beneficial for fully grasping the content.

Suggestions to Improve Clarity

To enhance clarity, the speaker could incorporate more explicit transitions between different sections of the talk. Summarizing key points at the end of each major section could help reinforce understanding. Additionally, providing visual aids or slides to illustrate complex data and concepts could further support audience comprehension.

Educational Value

9 /10

The content presented by Jeffrey Edmunds offers a compelling analysis of the current state of knowledge accessibility, particularly focusing on the transition from physical books to ebooks and the implications of copyright laws on ownership and access. It provides factual information about the economics of scholarly publishing, the role of libraries, and the concept of open access. The teaching methodology is effective, utilizing relatable analogies (e.g., the grocery store example) to illustrate complex ideas. The depth of content is significant, addressing systemic issues in higher education and advocating for a shift in how knowledge is perceived and accessed. This content has high knowledge retention potential as it encourages critical thinking about the value of knowledge as a public good. It also offers practical applications, such as the promotion of open educational resources, which can directly impact students and educators. Overall, it facilitates learning by challenging existing paradigms and encouraging active engagement with the topic.

Target Audience

Library science students Higher education administrators Scholars and researchers Policy makers in education Students concerned about textbook costs

Content Type Analysis

Content Type

Lecture
Format Effectiveness 9/10

Format Improvement Suggestions

  • Incorporate visual aids or slides to enhance understanding
  • Include real-life examples or case studies for better relatability
  • Add subtitles for accessibility
  • Utilize infographics to summarize key points
  • Engage the audience with interactive Q&A segments

Language & Readability

Original Language

English
Readability Score 4/10

Moderate readability. May contain some technical terms or complex sentences.

Content Longevity

Evergreen Score 8/10

Timeless Factors

  • Universal themes of access to knowledge and education
  • Fundamental principles of copyright and ownership
  • Ongoing relevance of digital content and licensing issues
  • The importance of libraries in promoting democracy and informed citizenry
  • The shift towards open access and educational resources
Update Necessity 4/10

Occasional updates recommended to maintain relevance.

Update Suggestions

  • Add context about current trends in digital publishing and open access initiatives
  • Update statistics related to ebook pricing and library budgets
  • Reference contemporary examples of successful open access journals or resources
  • Incorporate recent developments in copyright law affecting digital content
  • Discuss the impact of emerging technologies on access to knowledge
Tubi AI - Chat with Video

Hi! I'm Tubi AI, and I can help you understand this video better. Ask me anything about the content!